April 15, 2007

Survey Reveals Need For Standardized Oral Chemotherapy Prescribing Practices, Safeguards

Despite the widespread use of prescribing safeguards for infusion chemotherapy, few of those measures have been implemented with oral chemotherapy, according to a study led by researchers at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute.

In the Jan. 13 issue of the British Medical Journal, Saul N. Weingart, MD, PhD, vice president for patient safety at Dana-Farber, and his colleagues report that a survey of National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer centers found few organizations with standardized prescribing practices for oral chemotherapy.

"Given how quickly oral chemotherapies have become standard care for a growing number of cancers, we were not surprised to find variations in how organizations prescribe and monitor the use of these agents," said Weingart. "It was surprising, however, that few of the safeguards used with infusion chemotherapy have been adopted for oral chemotherapy."

The researchers sent a survey on the current practices for prescribing, coordinating and monitoring, dispensing, and educating patients about oral chemotherapy to 54 NCI-designated comprehensive cancer centers, of which 42 centers responded.

Weingart said the survey revealed significant variations in the manner prescriptions were generated at most centers and in the amount of information required to complete them.

Nearly 70 percent of the centers (29) used handwritten orders for the majority of oral chemotherapy prescriptions, five percent (2) used pre-printed paper prescriptions, and 14 percent (6) used computed-based prescription order entry systems.

An analysis of the information required to order prescriptions for six oral chemotherapies found that few centers mandated the inclusion of the patient's diagnosis (26 percent), the treatment's schedule and duration (9 percent), or the patient's body surface area (BSA) calculation, which is used to determine appropriate and safe drug dosage level, and only 21 percent of the centers required a second physician to review and approve the chemotherapy order. More than half of the centers had no required elements for oral chemotherapy prescriptions, noted Weingart, who is an associate professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School.

The respondents also reported that between 2004 and 2005 at least one serious adverse drug event related to oral chemotherapy occurred at 10 centers, and 13 centers experienced a 'serious near miss.'

"The growing availability of effective oral chemotherapy, especially the new class of 'targeted biologic therapies,' is one of the wonderful recent advances in cancer care, as it has given cancer patients unprecedented convenience compared to intravenous infusion therapy," said paper co-author Lawrence Shulman, MD, chief medical officer at Dana-Farber and an associate professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School. "However, these findings underline the importance of forging a consensus in the oncology field on standardized safeguards and practices for prescribing and monitoring the use of these drugs."

###

The paper's other authors are Daniela Brouillard, Laurinda Morway, EdM, Ann Partridge, MD, MPH, Sylvia Bartel, RPh, MHP, and Maureen Connor, RN, of Dana-Farber; and Jonathan Flug, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston.

The research was supported by the Center for Patient Safety at Dana-Farber and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (http://www.dana-farber.org/) is a principal teaching affiliate of the Harvard Medical School and is among the leading cancer research and care centers in the United States. It is a founding member of the Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center (DF/HCC), designated a comprehensive cancer center by the National Cancer Institute.

Contact: Bill Schaller
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Advanced Kidney Cancer - Median Progression-free Survival Doubled For Patients Treated With Nexavar (sorafenib), Phase III Data

Bayer HealthCare today announced the publication of encouraging Phase III data on sorafenib tablets - a treatment for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC/kidney cancer), in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM).

Sorafenib is the first, multi-kinase inhibitor indicated for the treatment of patients with advanced RCC who have failed prior interferon-alpha or interleukin-2 based therapy and also 1st line when patients are considered unsuitable for such therapy.

Patients treated with sorafenib demonstrated a doubling of median progression-free survival (PFS) (5.5 months vs. 2.8 months) compared to patients receiving placebo (p-value< 0.001)1. The data, as assessed by independent radiologic review, are taken from the largest randomised controlled trial ever conducted in advanced RCC known as 'Treatment Approaches in Renal Cancer Global Evaluation Trial' TARGET - study.

"Sorafenib and agents like it are exciting new treatments for patients with advanced kidney cancer who have no good standard options in this country at present," said study investigator Tim Eisen, Professor of Medical Oncology, Cambridge. He added: "The vast majority of patients can tolerate treatment easily. The main job for us now is to secure these drugs for the NHS."

TARGET - a multi-national, randomised, placebo-controlled Phase III study of sorafenib administered as a single agent was initiated in 2003.В  More than 900 patients with advanced RCC, who had previously failed one prior systemic therapy, were enrolled in 117 sites worldwide and randomised into two treatment arms of equal numbers to receive either 400 mg sorafenib or placebo twice a day. 1

PFS measures the time that a patient lives without evident tumour growth. In a planned sub-group analysis the benefit in PFS was seen in all subgroups studied, including patients who had not received conventional treatment, such as interleukin-2 or interferon-alpha. After the PFS endpoint was met in April 2005, Bayer discussed the clinical and statistical significance of this analysis with the principal investigators, the independent data monitoring committee and with regulatory authorities and agreed that it would not be ethical to continue the study with a placebo-control arm. The study was subsequently modified and all patients in the trial were offered access to sorafenib.

A further interim analysis of overall survival (OS) В based on 367 deaths and after 48% of the placebo patients (216 patients) had crossed over to sorafenib showed that median overall survival was 19.3 months for patients in the sorafenib group and 15.9 months for those in the placebo group (p=0.02). This analysis did not reach pre-specified O'Brien-Fleming boundaries for statistical significance.1

In the phase III study, sorafenib was generally well tolerated. The most common reported treatment-emergent adverse events of any severity were diarrhoea, rash, fatigue, hand-foot skin reaction, alopecia, nausea, pruritus, hypertension, vomiting, erythema and dry skin.2

About Sorafenib:

When launched in July 2006, sorafenib was the first new kidney cancer treatment in Europe for over 10 years.

Mechanism of Action:

Sorafenib is an oral multi-kinase inhibitor that targets both the tumour cell and tumour vasculature. In preclinical models, sorafenib targeted members of two classes of kinases (tyrosine kinases and serine/threonine kinases) known to be involved in both tumour cell proliferation (tumour growth) and tumour angiogenesis (tumour blood supply) - two important cancer growth activities. These kinases included RAF kinase, VEGFR-2, VEGFR-3, PDGFR-ОІ, c-KIT and FLT-3.2

Indication:

Sorafenib, (200 mg film-coated tablets) is indicated for the treatment of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma who have failed prior interferon-alpha or interleukin-2 based therapy and also 1st line when patients are considered unsuitable for such therapy.2

Sorafenib is being evaluated as a single agent in a Phase III clinical trial for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), or liver cancer, a study that has completed enrolment. A Phase III clinical trial of Nexavar combined with carboplatin and paclitaxel in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for treatment-naive patients was initiated in the first half of 2006. In addition to company-sponsored trials, there are a number of sorafenib studies being sponsored by government agencies, cooperative groups, and individual investigators.

About Kidney Cancer:

The Disease:

More than 6,600 people are diagnosed with kidney cancer each year in the UK. Kidney cancer causes around 3,600 deaths each year in the UK.3 In adults in England and Wales almost 90% of malignant kidney tumours arise in the renal parenchyma and the renal pelvis.3 Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common type of kidney cancer in adults, causing up to 85 percent of all kidney cancers.4

Key Statistics:

Kidney cancer affects both men and women with a ratio of 5 new diagnoses in men for every 3 in women3 Between 1975 and 2002, the incidence of kidney cancer in the UK has almost doubled for both men and women aged over 65 years.3

In men incidence rates increased by 79% between 1975 and 2002 (from 7.1 in 100,000 in 1975 to 12.7 per 100,000 in 2002), and by 90% in women (from 3.2 to 6.1 per 100, 000) over the same time period, mainly affecting men over 65 and women over 55 years.3

Risk Factors:

The major risk factors for kidney cancer include age and sex, obesity, smoking, and several genetic and medical conditions. Other factors such as phenacetin use and occupation also increase risk but these exposures are not widespread and most likely account for a small number of cases.5

Symptoms:

In the early stages kidney cancer does not generally cause any symptoms.3

Late symptoms include6: blood in the urine - haematuria; low back pain unrelated to injury; a lump in the abdomen in the region of the kidneys; fatigue; weight loss; recurrent fevers not associated with colds or flu; high blood pressure; swelling of the ankles and legs.

Treatment:

The treatment of kidney cancer depends on the severity of the cancer and the patient's overall health. The main treatment for kidney cancer is surgery4, which is effective when all of the cancer is removed.

For further information please visit: http://info.cancerresearchuk.org

Nexavar(R) is a registered trademark of Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corporation.

About Bayer HealthCare:

Bayer HealthCare AG, with sales of approximately 9.4 billion Euros in 2005, is one of the world's leading, innovative companies in the healthcare and medical products industry. The company combines the global activities of the Animal Health, Consumer Care, Diabetes Care and Pharmaceuticals divisions. Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corporation is part of the new Global Pharmaceutical Division, established January 1, 2006, which consists of the former Biological Products and Pharmaceutical Division and now comprises three business units: Haematology/Cardiology; Oncology and Primary Care.В  Bayer HealthCare AG employed 33,800 people worldwide in 2005.

Bayer HealthCare AG's aim is to discover and manufacture innovative products that will improve human and animal health worldwide. The products enhance well-being and quality of life by diagnosing, preventing and treating disease.

http://www.bayerhealthcare.com

References:

1. Escudier B et al, New Engl J Med 2007 356 (2): 11-20
2. В Nexavar Summary of Product Characteristics
3. Cancer Research UK, Cancer Statistics by Type, kidney cancer
4. Cohen N. N Engl J Med, 2005; 353:В  2477-2490
5. Quin, M., et al. Cancer Trends in England and Wales 1950-1999. ed., Vol. SMPS No. 66. 2001: TSO
6. American Cancer Society, Detailed Guide: Kidney Cancer - Surgery

Top Cancer Meeting Breaks Attendance Record For 2006

The American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology broke an all-time attendance record for its 48th Annual Scientific Meeting, held November 5-9, 2006, at the Pennsylvania Convention Center in Philadelphia. ASTRO recorded more than 11,800 attendees at the 2006 Annual Meeting, compared to more than 10,300 attendees in 2005.

2006 was a successful year for ASTRO's Annual Meeting. The Annual Meeting brought an estimated $34 million in revenue to Philadelphia and was the largest convention to visit the city in 2006 according to the Philadelphia Convention and Visitors Bureau. Also last year, ASTRO's Annual Meeting was selected by Tradeshow Week, a respected weekly industry magazine, as one of the 50 fastest growing tradeshows in the United States and Canada. This was the third time in four years ASTRO received this honor.

"ASTRO's Annual Meeting is an opportunity for my colleagues in the cancer community to come together to learn the latest in cancer research while previewing new technology, all with the goal of better helping our patients beat cancer," said K. Kian Ang, M.D., Ph.D., ASTRO's Chair. "Our meeting in Philadelphia was exemplary in showcasing the best of what's to come in our field. I'm particularly grateful to my colleagues Steve Hahn and Peter Mauch for their hard work putting together such commendable scientific program and educational sessions."

"Our Annual Meeting is the premier scientific meeting in the field of radiation oncology," said Laura I. Thevenot, ASTRO's Chief Executive Officer. "I am so proud of Michele Cordie in Meetings, Kathy Thomas in Education and the rest of the ASTRO staff for their Herculean efforts to manage the complicated logistics of the meeting while putting together a top-notch scientific program. This meeting was our largest and we look forward to another great meeting in Los Angeles."

ASTRO's 49th Annual Meeting will be held October 28 through November 1, 2007, at the Los Angeles Convention Center in Los Angeles.

В  ASTRO is the largest radiation oncology society in the world, with more than 8,500 members who specialize in treating patients with radiation therapies. As the leading organization in radiation oncology, biology and physics, the Society is dedicated to the advancement of the practice of radiation oncology by promoting excellence in patient care, providing opportunities for educational and professional development, promoting research and disseminating research results and representing radiation oncology in a rapidly evolving socioeconomic healthcare environment.

The American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO)
8280 Willow Oaks Corporate Drive, Suite 500
Fairfax, VAВ  22031
http://www.astro.org
http://www.rtanswers.org

NeoRecormon Gains European Approval For Convenient Once Weekly Treatment Of Anaemia In Patients With Solid Cancers

Roche announced today that it has received European marketing approval for a simple and convenient once weekly subcutaneous injection of NeoRecormon (epoetin beta) 30,000 IU for the treatment of anaemia in patients with solid cancers receiving chemotherapy. This expansion of the product label means that patients will no longer have the burden of three injections per week and their anaemia can be managed in a more convenient way.

Anaemia affects up to 95% of cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.1 It can develop as a result of the cancer itself or as a consequence of its treatment. For most patients anaemia manifests itself as an extreme and overwhelming fatigue that makes the impact of cancer even more devastating.

NeoRecormon 30,000 IU once weekly is proven to effectively2 and rapidly3,4 correct anaemia irrespective of the type of chemotherapy patients receive. It also reduces the need for blood transfusions by at least 50% compared to standard care5,6 and has been shown to significantly increase the time until patients need a first transfusion.7 Patients treated with NeoRecormon often experience an improvement in their quality of life8 and an increase in their daily energy levels.6,9

Key supportive data for the new label came from the BRAVE (BReast cancer - Anaemia and the Value of Erythropoietin) study, which was conducted in women with metastatic breast cancer receiving chemotherapy5,7,10 and the NAUTICA study conducted in patients with a wide range of cancer types also receiving chemotherapy.3

About NeoRecormon

NeoRecormon is prescribed for the treatment of symptomatic anaemia in patients with cancer. Treating anaemia increases red blood cell (haemoglobin) numbers and oxygen levels allowing the body to function effectively, which improves patients' quality of life and reduces morbidity.

NeoRecormon is one of Roche's leading biotechnology achievements and market leader in the countries in which it is sold.

With the label expansion announced today NeoRecormon 30,000 IU once weekly is now indicated for the treatment of symptomatic anaemia in adult patients with solid and lymphoid cancers receiving any form of chemotherapy. Treatment with NeoRecormon is initiated when patients' haemoglobin level is 11 g/dl or below and given to maintain a haemoglobin level of up to 13g/dl.

About Roche

Headquartered in Basel, Switzerland, Roche is one of the world's leading research-focused healthcare groups in the fields of pharmaceuticals and diagnostics. As a supplier of innovative products and services for the early detection, prevention, diagnosis and treatment of disease, the Group contributes on a broad range of fronts to improving people's health and quality of life. Roche is a world leader in diagnostics, the leading supplier of medicines for cancer and transplantation and a market leader in virology. Roche employs roughly 70,000 people in 150 countries and has R&D agreements and strategic alliances with numerous partners, including majority ownership interests in Genentech and Chugai. Additional information about the Roche Group is available on the Internet (http://www.roche.com).

All trademarks used or mentioned in this release are protected by law.

References

1. Groopman & Itri. Natl Cancer Inst 1999;91:1616 34.

2. Leonard et al. Ann Oncol 2004; 15 (Suppl 3):iii 50 Abstract 188P.

3. SpaГ«th et al 2006; 17 (Suppl 9): ix294 Abstract 1020P.

4. Boogaerts et al. Anticancer Res. 2006; 26:479-484.

5. Marangolo et al. Eur J Cancer Suppl 2005; 3: 388 Abstract 1347.

6. OrdГіnez et al. Lung Cancer 2005; 49(Suppl 2): S339 Abstract P-836.

7. Aapro et al. 29th Annual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2006; Poster 6095.

8. Boogaerts et al. Br J Cancer 2003; 88: 988-995.

9. de Castro et al. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2006; Jul 28 (Epub ahead of print).

10. Marangolo et al. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2005;23: 16S, Part I of II: 8141.

Roche
http://www.roche.com

ERBITUX® Phase III Study Meets Primary Endpoint In First-Line Treatment Of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

ImClone Systems Incorporated (NASDAQ: IMCL) and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (NYSE: BMY) today announced that a Phase III study of ERBITUX® (cetuximab) plus FOLFIRI (an irinotecan- based chemotherapy) met the primary endpoint of increasing median duration of progression-free survival over FOLFIRI alone in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). More than 1,000 patients were recruited from around the world to participate in the study, known as the CRYSTAL1 study.

"Despite advancements, metastatic disease remains difficult to treat. This study demonstrates the potential benefit of adding ERBITUX to first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer," said Eric Rowinsky, M.D., Chief Medical Officer and Senior Vice President of ImClone Systems.

"These results provide important new information for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, and are part of a comprehensive clinical development program designed to fully understand the potential uses of ERBITUX for cancer patients," said Martin Birkhofer, M.D., Vice President, Oncology Global Medical Affairs, Bristol-Myers Squibb.

The study was conducted by Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, ImClone Systems' ERBITUX partner outside of North America. Results have been submitted for presentation at the 2007 American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting in Chicago in June.

About ERBITUX® (Cetuximab)

ERBITUX is a monoclonal antibody (IgG1 Mab) designed to inhibit the function of a molecular structure expressed on the surface of normal and tumor cells called the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR, HER1, c-ErbB-1). In vitro assays and in vivo animal studies have shown that binding of ERBITUX to the EGFR blocks phosphorylation and activation of receptor-associated kinases, resulting in inhibition of cell growth, induction of apoptosis, and decreased matrix metalloproteinase and vascular endothelial growth factor production. In vitro, ERBITUX can mediate antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) against certain human tumor types. While the mechanism of ERBITUX' anti-tumor effect(s) in vivo is unknown, all of these processes may contribute to the overall therapeutic effect of ERBITUX. EGFR is part of a signaling pathway that is linked to the growth and development of many human cancers, including those of the head and neck, colon and rectum.

ERBITUX (Cetuximab), in combination with radiation therapy, is indicated for the treatment of locally or regionally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. ERBITUX as a single agent is indicated for the treatment of patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck for whom prior platinum-based therapy has failed.

ERBITUX is indicated for the treatment of EGFR-expressing, metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC) in combination with irinotecan for patients who are refractory to irinotecan-based chemotherapy, and as a single agent for patients who are intolerant to irinotecan-based therapy. The effectiveness of ERBITUX for the treatment of EGFR-expressing mCRC cancer is based on objective response rates. Currently, no data are available that demonstrate an improvement in disease-related symptoms or increased survival with ERBITUX for the treatment of EGFR-expressing mCRC.

For full prescribing information, including boxed WARNINGS regarding infusion reactions and cardiopulmonary arrest, visit http://www.erbitux.com/.

Important Safety Information

Grade 3/4 infusion reactions, rarely with fatal outcome (<1 in 1000), occurred in approximately 3% (46/1485) of patients receiving ERBITUX (Cetuximab) therapy. These reactions are characterized by rapid onset of airway obstruction (bronchospasm, stridor, hoarseness), urticaria, hypotension, and/or cardiac arrest. Severe infusion reactions require immediate and permanent discontinuation of ERBITUX therapy.

Most reactions (90%) were associated with the first infusion of ERBITUX despite the use of prophylactic antihistamines. Caution must be exercised with every ERBITUX infusion as there were patients who experienced their first severe infusion reaction during later infusions. A 1-hour observation period is recommended following the ERBITUX infusion. Longer observation periods may be required in patients who experience infusion reactions.

Cardiopulmonary arrest and/or sudden death occurred in 2% (4/208) of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck treated with radiation therapy and ERBITUX as compared to none of 212 patients treated with radiation therapy alone. Fatal events occurred within 1 to 43 days after the last ERBITUX treatment. ERBITUX in combination with radiation therapy should be used with caution in patients with known coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure and arrhythmias. Close monitoring of serum electrolytes, including serum magnesium, potassium, and calcium during and after ERBITUX therapy is recommended.

Severe cases of interstitial lung disease (ILD), which was fatal in one case, occurred in less than 0.5% of 774 patients with advanced colorectal cancer (mCRC) receiving ERBITUX. There was one case of ILD reported in 796 patients with head and neck cancer receiving ERBITUX in clinical studies.

In clinical studies of ERBITUX, dermatologic toxicities, including acneform rash, skin drying and fissuring, and inflammatory and infectious sequelae (eg, blepharitis, cheilitis, cellulitis, cyst) were reported. In 208 patients receiving ERBITUX + RT, acneform rash was reported in 87% (17% severe) as compared to 10% in 212 patients treated with radiation therapy alone (1% severe). In patients receiving ERBITUX alone, 76% (N=103) experienced acneform rash (1% severe). In patients with mCRC, acneform rash was reported in 89% (686/774) of all treated patients, and was severe in 11% (84/774). Subsequent to the development of severe dermatologic toxicities, complications including S. aureus sepsis and abscesses requiring incision and drainage were reported. Sun exposure may exacerbate these effects. A related nail disorder, occurring in 12% (0.4% Grade 3) of patients, was characterized as a paronychial inflammation.

The safety of ERBITUX in combination with radiation therapy and cisplatin has not been established. Death and serious cardiotoxicity were observed in a single-am trial with ERBITUX, delayed, accelerated (concomitant boost) fractionation radiation therapy, and cisplatin (100 mg/m2) conducted in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Two of 21 patients died, one as a result of pneumonia and one of an unknown cause. Four patients discontinued treatment due to adverse events. Two of these discontinuations were due to cardiac events (myocardial infarction in one patient and arrhythmia, diminished cardiac output, and hypotension in the other patient).

The incidence of hypomagnesemia (both overall and severe [NCI CTC Grades 3 & 4]) was increased in patients receiving ERBITUX alone or in combination with chemotherapy as compared to those receiving best supportive care or chemotherapy alone based on ongoing, controlled clinical trials in 244 patients. Approximately one-half of these patients receiving ERBITUX experienced hypomagnesemia and 10-15% experienced severe hypomagnesemia. Electrolyte repletion was necessary in some patients and in severe cases, intravenous replacement was required. Patients receiving ERBITUX therapy should be periodically monitored for hypomagnesemia, and accompanying hypocalcemia and hypokalemia during, and up to 8 weeks following the completion of, ERBITUX therapy.

The most serious adverse reactions associated with ERBITUX in combination with radiation therapy in 208 patients with head and neck cancer were infusion reaction (3%), cardiopulmonary arrest (2%), dermatologic toxicity (2.5%), mucositis (6%), radiation dermatitis (3%), confusion (2%), and diarrhea (2%). The most serious adverse reactions associated with ERBITUX in mCRC clinical trials (N=774) were infusion reaction (3%), dermatologic toxicity (1%), interstitial lung disease (0.4%), fever (5%), sepsis (3%), kidney failure (2%), pulmonary embolus (1%), dehydration (5% in patients receiving ERBITUX with irinotecan, 2% in patients receiving ERBITUX as a single agent) and diarrhea (6% in patients receiving ERBITUX with irinotecan, 0.2% in patients receiving ERBITUX as a single agent).

The overall incidence of late radiation toxicities (any grade) was higher with ERBITUX in combination with radiation therapy compared with radiation therapy alone. The following sites were affected: salivary glands (65%/56%), larynx (52%/36%), subcutaneous tissue (49%/45%), mucous membranes (48%/39%), esophagus (44%/35%), skin (42%/33%), brain (11%/9%), lung (11%/8%), spinal cord (4%/3%), and bone (4%/5%) in the ERBITUX and radiation versus radiation alone arms, respectively.

The incidence of Grade 3 or 4 late radiation toxicities were generally similar between the radiation therapy alone and the ERBITUX plus radiation therapy arms.

The most common adverse events seen in patients with carcinomas of the head and neck receiving ERBITUX in combination with radiation therapy (n=208) versus radiation alone (n=212) were mucositis-stomatitis (93%/94%), acneform rash (87%/10%), radiation dermatitis (86%/90%), weight loss (84%/72%), xerostomia (72%/71%), dysphagia (65%/63%), asthenia (56%/49%), nausea (49%/37%), constipation (35%/30%) and vomiting (29%/23%). The most common adverse events seen in patients with carcinomas of the head and neck receiving ERBITUX as a single agent (N=103) were acneform rash (76%), asthenia (45%), pain (28%), fever (27%) and weight loss (27%).

The most common adverse events seen in patients with mCRC receiving ERBITUX with irinotecan (n=354) or ERBITUX as a single agent (n=420) were acneform rash (88%/90%), asthenia/malaise (73%/48%), diarrhea (72%/25%), nausea (55%/29%), abdominal pain (45%/26%), vomiting (41%/25%), fever (34%/27%), constipation (30%/26%), and headache (14%/26%).

About Colorectal Cancer

In the U.S., approximately 149,000 people will be diagnosed with cancer of the colon or rectum this year. Half of these patients have metastatic disease, or cancer that has spread to other organs, at the time of diagnosis. EGFR is expressed in up to 77.7% of colorectal cancer tumors. Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in both men and women.2

About ImClone Systems

ImClone Systems Incorporated is committed to advancing oncology care by developing a portfolio of targeted biologic treatments designed to address the medical needs of patients with a variety of cancers. The Company's research and development programs include growth factor blockers and angiogenesis inhibitors. ImClone Systems' strategy is to become a fully integrated biopharmaceutical company, taking its development programs from the research stage to the market. ImClone Systems' headquarters and research operations are located in New York City, with additional administration and manufacturing facilities in Branchburg, New Jersey.

Certain matters discussed in this news release may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and the Federal securities laws. Although the company believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable assumptions it can give no assurance that its expectations will be achieved. Forward-looking information is subject to certain risks, trends and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. Many of these factors are beyond the company's ability to control or predict. Important factors that may cause actual results to differ materially and could impact the company and the statements contained in this news release can be found in the company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and annual reports on Form 10-K. For forward-looking statements in this news release, the company claims the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The company assumes no obligation to update or supplement any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

About Bristol-Myers Squibb

Bristol-Myers Squibb is dedicated to the discovery, development and exhaustive exploration of innovative cancer fighting therapies designed to extend and enhance the lives of patients living with cancer. More than 40 years ago, Bristol-Myers Squibb built a unified vision for the future of cancer treatment. With expertise, dedication and resolve, that vision led to the development of a diverse global portfolio of anti-cancer therapies that are an important cornerstone of care today. Hundreds of scientists at Bristol- Myers Squibb's Pharmaceutical Research Institute are studying ways to improve current cancer treatments and identify better, more effective medicines for the future.

Bristol-Myers Squibb is a global pharmaceutical and related health care products company whose mission is to extend and enhance human life.

This press release contains "forward-looking statements" as that term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 regarding product development. Such forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and involve inherent risks and uncertainties, including factors that could delay, divert or change any of them, and could cause actual outcomes and results to differ materially from current expectations. No forward-looking statement can be guaranteed. Forward-looking statements in this press release should be evaluated together with the many uncertainties that affect Bristol-Myers Squibb's business, particularly those identified in the cautionary factors discussion in Bristol-Myers Squibb's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 and in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q. Bristol-Myers Squibb undertakes no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

1 Cetuximab combined with iRinotecan in first line therapY for metaSTatic colorectAL cancer

2 American Cancer Society: Cancer Facts and Figures 2006. http://www.cancer.org/downloads/STT/CAFF2006PWSecured.pdf. Accessed 5/16/06.

ERBITUX®
http://www.erbitux.com/

Brain Stem Cells Against Cancer?

Gliomas are a group of brain tumors where the most common type is also the most aggressive one. Chemotherapy and radiation have little effect on malignant gliomas, and patients survive only about a year after being diagnosed. But research at Lund University in Sweden provides hope that it may be possible in the future to develop stem cells from the brain into a new way to treat gliomas.

Neural stem cells have been shown to have the ability to recognize signals from tumor cells in the brain and migrate there. If stem cells are injected into a part of the brain in laboratory animals with a glioma in another part of their brain, the stem cells migrate over to the tumor area.

This has spawned the idea of having stem cells transport drugs or immune stimulants to the tumor. This was the principle the Lund scientists wanted to test. But as it turned out, no extra assistance was needed: the stem cells themselves had the ability to combat the tumor.

"We were truly amazed when we saw this effect! To be sure about the phenomenon, we ran several experiments with other stem cells, and it was confirmed that certain neural stem cells actually have an anti-tumor effect," says Karin Staflin. She is describing the findings in her dissertation, which she will soon defend.

It is as yet unknown just why this happens. One plausible reason is that both normal neural stem cells and glioma cells are immature, not fully mature cells. They are therefore more like each other than any other types of cells in the brain, which may enable them to 'speak' to each other and influence each other. The research team at Lund has also shown that stem cells can cure colon cancer in lab animals.

"Cells in aggressive malignant cancer forms are often characterized as being more immature than their environment. This may be what enables neural stem cells to affect intestinal cancer cells," says Karin Staflin.

Many years of research remain before the newly discovered principle is ready to be tested on humans. First, researchers need to learn to understand the mechanisms better and identify the factors in neural cells which make them so effective. The notion is still new, but it does provide a glimmer of hope for a cure for a thus far incurable disease.

The dissertation is titled Neural progenitor cells in malignancy and injury of the brain: A Trojan horse for gliomas?

The Swedish Research Council

The Swedish Research Council bears national responsibility for developing the country's basic research towards attainment of a strong international position. The Council has three main tasks: research funding, science communication and research policy. Research is the foundation for the development of knowledge in society, and the basis of high-quality education. Research is also crucial as a means of enhancing welfare through economic, social and cultural development.

http://www.vr.se

Leptin A Potential Link To Colon Cancer

Tests on three human colon cancer cell lines showed that the fat-hormone 'leptin' may enhance the growth of colonic cancers. This finding could show why obese people are at increased risk of colon cancer. It could also point to new modes of treating this type of cancer, finds research from the University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, published today in BJS.

Leptin is a hormone that is released from fat cells (adipocytes) the more fat you have, the more leptin will be in your blood stream. This hormone plays an important role in regulating bodyweight and energy expenditure.

People who are obese have a two to three fold increased risk of developing colon cancer compared to similar normal-weight individuals. Research has also revealed that some colon cancer cells carry receptors for leptin.

The question is whether there is any evidence that these receptors could respond to increased levels of leptin that are caused by the obesity, and trigger the colon cancer cells to start dividing and growing. Now research shows that this may well be the case.

"These results may explain why obesity increases a person's risk of colonic cancer, and the fact that we have shown how leptin stimulates these cells means that drug companies may be in a better position to develop new treatments against the disease," says research co-author Dr Kim Barrett.

By culturing cancer cells in a laboratory, they found that leptin could stimulate growth. In two out of three cell lines, leptin also prevented the sort of programmed cell death (apoptosis) that allows for the orderly death of normal cells, but when reduced, can contribute to cancer.

The researchers then went on to reveal many of the signaling pathways that leptin affected in the cell. This showed that leptin does indeed interfere with many known intra-cellular systems that influence cancer cells.

About the JOHN WILEY & SONS

Wiley is a leading publisher for the scientific, technical, and medical (STM) communities worldwide. Our STM programs encompass journals, encyclopedias, and electronic products in subjects such as the life and medical sciences, chemistry, statistics and mathematics, electrical and electronics engineering, and select medical areas with an emphasis on cancer medicine. Through Wiley InterScience, we provide academic and corporate customers with online access to a broad range of STM content through licensing agreements.

JOHN WILEY & SONS
The Atrium
Southern Gate
Chichester
PO 19 8SQ
http://www.wiley.com

Researchers Urge Monitoring Of Bone Health During Chemotherapy

In laboratory tests on mice, researchers found that a medication often used to reduce toxic side effects of chemotherapy induced bone loss and helped tumors grow in bone. So the researchers at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis are recommending increased awareness of bone health during cancer treatments.

The medication studied is a growth factor commonly used to help cancer patients recover healthy blood counts after chemotherapy, which can destroy white blood cells. Low levels of white blood cells leave patients susceptible to infection.

"This growth factor encourages bone breakdown, and any therapy that decreases bone density could potentially enhance tumor growth in bone," says senior author Katherine Weilbaecher, M.D., assistant professor of medicine and of cell biology and physiology. "But there are things that can be done to counteract this. Physicians should carefully monitor their cancer patient's bone health with regular bone density scans (DEXA) and prescribe medications to prevent bone loss when needed. And patients should consume enough calcium and vitamin D and get sufficient exercise to maintain strong bones."

Weilbaecher and her colleagues found that when they gave mice an eight-day course of the growth factor, called granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), the mice lost bone mass and experienced increased bone tumor growth when injected with cancer cells. Their study will appear in an upcoming issue of the journal Blood and is now available online.

G-CSF is known by the trade names Neupogen, Neulasta and Granocyte. Clinical use of G-CSF has recently increased because by speeding blood cell regrowth it allows patients to undergo more intensive chemotherapy regimens in which anticancer agents are given at more frequent intervals. Studies have suggested these dose-dense therapies could prolong survival in women with breast cancer.

"We are not at all advocating ending G-CSF use," says Weilbaecher, an oncologist with the Siteman Cancer Center at Washington University School of Medicine and Barnes-Jewish Hospital. "G-CSF seems to have significant benefits for some cancer patients."

Although G-CSF had a strong effect on bone metastasis in the experimental mice, early clinical trials in humans using G-CSF with chemotherapy have so far shown no adverse effects on survival and no increase in bone metastasis. In fact, breast-cancer patients undergoing dose-dense chemotherapy with G-CSF support tend to have a longer disease-free period than those getting standard dosing without G-CSF.

"It's possible that women on G-CSF-supported chemotherapy could do even better if we paid more attention to skeletal health," says lead author Angela Hirbe, an M.D./Ph.D. student in Weilbaecher's lab. "Strengthening the skeleton would not only help prevent osteoporosis and fractures but also might give patients a survival advantage."

In the laboratory mice studied, G-CSF increased the number and activity of bone cells called osteoclasts, which resorb bone material as part of the normal process of bone turnover. The resulting loss of bone density created a favorable environment for bone tumor growth.

When the researchers injected melanoma or breast cancer cells into mice, those getting G-CSF developed a two-fold increase in tumor burden, a measure of the size and severity of tumors, compared to those that did not receive G-CSF.

Interestingly, mice treated with a bisphosphonate, an anti-osteoporosis agent that inhibits osteoclasts, were resistant to the effects of G-CSF on bone tumor growth. Weilbaecher is currently investigating bisphosphonates as a means to prevent tumor metastasis to bone in breast cancer patients.

"We used G-CSF as a tool to understand the implications for tumor growth when osteoclast activity is revved up," Weilbaecher says. "But G-CSF isn't unique in its effect. For example, antihormone therapies used to treat breast and prostate cancer also can decrease bone mineral density. We would like to see clinical trials instigated to study the effects of such cancer therapies on bone health and tumor metastasis."

Hirbe AC, UluГ§kan -, Morgan EA, Eagleton MC, Prior JL, Piwnica-Worms D, Trinkaus K, Apicelli A, Weilbaecher K. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor enhances bone tumor growth in mice in an osteoclast-dependent manner. Blood Dec 27, 2006 (advance online publication).

Funding from the National Cancer Institute supported this research.

Washington University School of Medicine's full-time and volunteer faculty physicians also are the medical staff of Barnes-Jewish and St. Louis Children's hospitals. The School of Medicine is one of the leading medical research, teaching and patient care institutions in the nation, currently ranked fourth in the nation by U.S. News & World Report. Through its affiliations with Barnes-Jewish and St. Louis Children's hospitals, the School of Medicine is linked to BJC HealthCare. Siteman Cancer Center is the only NCI-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center within a 240-mile radius of St. Louis. Siteman Cancer Center is composed of the combined cancer research and treatment programs of Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine.

Washington University in St. Louis
One Brookings Dr., Campus Box 1070
St. Louis, MO 63130
United States
http://www.wustl.edu/

High-Power MRI Helps Surgical Team Predict Outcomes In Unusual Tumor Cases

A Mayo Clinic surgical team has found that using a 3-Tesla MRI in surgical decision making provides a new level of capability to predict surgical outcomes that improves patient care by minimizing the potential for unsuccessful tumor-removal surgeries. The Mayo Clinic report appears in the December issue of the Journal of Neurosurgery.

In their report, Mayo physicians describe a case study of five patients. Four had neurofibromatosis, a condition with a predisposition to nerve-related tumors. All patients suffered from growths called "sciatic notch dumbbell-shaped" tumors. The tumors were benign, but resulted in neurologic dysfunction and disabling pain.

"In the past, if surgeons couldn't tell prior to surgery where the exact location of the large tumor was in relation to the sciatic nerve, it meant they couldn't predict in which cases surgery could be performed safely," explains Robert Spinner, M.D., the lead neurosurgeon on the Mayo Clinic team.

The team used an advanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system performed on a 3-Tesla magnet to help identify suitable candidates for a difficult tumor-removal surgery. A Tesla is a unit of magnet strength. A 3-Tesla is one of the strongest commercially available.

Significance of the Mayo Clinic Case Study

A standardized surgical approach for safe and complete removal of sciatic notch dumbbell-shaped tumors has been problematic for at least three reasons. These tumors are:

-- relatively rare and therefore hard to study

-- anatomically difficult to reach and remove without injuring the main sciatic nerve

-- difficult to visualize before surgery with enough detail to distinguish tumor boundaries from nerve

The current Mayo Clinic report begins to change this situation by documenting a new multidisciplinary approach for obtaining the desired favorable surgical outcomes.

Surgeons need an accurate picture of how and whether they can remove a tumor while protecting a nerve. Otherwise, patients may be exposed to the risks of surgery without achieving surgical benefits if the tumor is inoperable because complete removal would damage a nerve. "Our experience demonstrates the advantages of predictive imaging at the outset," says Dr. Spinner. "With an integrated team of surgeons from three specialties, and an experienced radiologist specializing in advanced peripheral nerve imaging using the 3-Tesla MRI, we have devised an approach that minimizes unsuccessful tumor-removal surgeries."

About the Study

With the 3-Tesla MRI images, Mayo Clinic surgeons from three specialties -- neurosurgery, colorectal and orthopedic surgery -- obtained sufficiently detailed pictures of the tumor and nerve relationship before surgery in all five cases to accurately predict which patients would benefit from surgery. In three cases the tumor was predicted to be distinct from the main sciatic nerve, and the tumor was safely removed. All three patients experienced relief from pain and had no recurrent growth one year after surgery. In the other two cases, the tumor was predicted to be so entwined in the nerve that surgery would have damaged the nerve. Those patients did not undergo surgery.

Dr. Spinner said the team will continue to refine the approach to improve the care that these patients receive. "This new technology allows a multidisciplinary approach to be performed safely in these rare tumors that were once considered unresectable," he says. "In addition, the same techniques that we have developed have tremendous applications to many patients who have peripheral nerve tumors in more common locations."

Collaboration

Other members of the Mayo Clinic team included: Toshiki Endo, M.D.; Kimberly Amrami, M.D.; Eric Dozois, M.D.; Dusica Babovic-Vuksanovic, M.D.; and Franklin Sim, M.D.

Mayo Clinic
200 First St. SW
Rochester, MN 55902
United States
http://www.mayoclinic.com/

Newly Released Prisoners At High Risk For Death

Prisoners who have been recently released from prison have a high death rate, especially in the first two weeks after release, a new study finds. The findings will be published in the Jan. 11 issue of The New England Journal of Medicine.

The study was conducted by Ingrid Binswanger, MD, of the University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center's School of Medicine, Marc Stern, MD, health services director of the Washington State Department of Corrections, and other researchers at the University of Washington and Harborview Medical Center in Seattle. Binswanger conducted the research while taking part in the Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program at the University of Washington and the VA Puget Sound Health Care System.

In the first study of its kind in the U.S., Binswanger analyzed data from 30,237 inmates released from prison between 1999 and 2003 in Washington state. The sample represented almost all prisoners released during that time. Of those individuals, 443 died during an average follow-up time of 1.9 years.

The death rates of the released prisoners were compared to the death rates of other Washington residents of the same age, gender, and race. The study found that newly released prisoners were 12.7 times as likely to die in the two weeks following their release compared to other state residents in the same demographic groups. Over the whole study, the former inmates were 3.5 times more likely to die than other state residents. The death rate among former inmates was considerably higher than the death rate among inmates in prison.

"These striking findings suggest that former inmates are at high risk for death following their release from prison," said Binswanger. "These results, along with findings from studies done in other countries, underscore the need for novel programs to reduce the risk of death in former inmates."

The leading causes of death were drug overdose, cardiovascular disease, homicide and suicide. Nearly one quarter of the deaths were a result of drug overdose, and half of these deaths resulted from cocaine. After cocaine, most overdose deaths were caused by methamphetamine and opiates like heroin. Lung cancer represented half of all the cancer deaths in this population.

Younger individuals tended to die from overdose, homicide and suicide, whereas older individuals tended to die from cardiovascular disease and cancer. Binswanger recommends programs targeted by age to address this difference.

"The U.S. has exceptionally high rates of incarceration," said Binswanger. "When a released prisoner dies, it may have an impact beyond his own life, affecting families and communities. These findings suggest that we need programs and policies targeted at decreasing the risk of death as former inmates transition back into their communities."

Binswanger is a physician researcher and an assistant professor in the Division of General Internal Medicine at UCDHSC's School of Medicine. Her research focuses on health, the criminal justice system, and vulnerable populations.

The School of Medicine faculty work to advance science and improve care as the physicians, educators and scientists at University of Colorado Hospital, The Children's Hospital, Denver Health, National Jewish Medical and Research Center and the Veterans Administration Medical Center. The School is part of the University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center, one of three universities in the University of Colorado system. For more information, visit the Web site at http://www.uchsc.edu or the UCDHSC Newsroom at http://www.uchsc.edu/news.

University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center
Mail Stop F-413 PO Box 6508
Aurora, CO 80045-0508
United States
http://www.uchsc.edu/